Business Daily Media

Should online users be bound by their privacy agreements?

  • Written by Samuel Becher, Associate Professor of Business Law, Victoria University of Wellington
image

The political economy of digital capitalism[1] is largely premised on a new exchange: individuals enjoy cheap or free services and goods in exchange for their personal information[2].

Put simply, individuals often pay online, consciously or unintentionally, with their data and privacy. As a result, companies hold a vast amount of information on consumers[3], and consumers allegedly agree to that practice. But as our research[4] shows, online privacy agreements are largely incomprehensible.

Read more: Why are Australians still using Facebook?[5]

Regulating privacy

Privacy issues are becoming more and more salient, in part due to enormous privacy scandals. Perhaps most conspicuously, a massive public protest erupted in response to the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal[6]. In this case, the data of millions of people’s Facebook profiles was harvested. Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, testified[7] before two US senate committees about the company’s privacy practices.

Read more: Why you should talk to your children about Cambridge Analytica[8]

Privacy is now also at the forefront of policy making. The most systematic legislative attempt to make more order in the messy world of privacy is the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR[9]). It comes as no surprise that European legislature was breaking the ground in this realm. The EU is known to have a strong focus on citizens’ rights[10]. It is committed to data protection, and to consumer protection[11] more generally.

The GDPR came into force[12] in May 2018. Its primary objective is to level the playing field and give individuals more control over their personal data. The GDPR also aspires to force companies to be more transparent around data collection and more cautious about its usage.

Clear and plain language

Another interesting aspect of the GDPR is its requirement to clearly communicate privacy terms to end users. In this respect, the GDPR requires companies to use “clear and plain language[13]” in their privacy agreements.

Making privacy policies readable may bring about a few notable benefits. For starters, drafting readable policies better respects users’ autonomy. Beyond that, readability can contribute to better comprehension of legal texts. This, in turn, can make such texts more salient, leading companies to draft more balanced terms.

But does this indeed materialise? In our study[14] (with Professor Uri Benoliel from Israel[15]), we examined whether, half a year post-GDPR, companies present users with online privacy agreements that are readable. We applied two well-established linguistic tools: the Flesch Reading Ease test[16] and the Flesch-Kincaid test[17]. Both tests are based on the average sentence length and the average number of syllables per word.

We measured the readability of more than 200 privacy policies. We gathered these policies from the most popular English websites in the UK and Ireland. Our sample included policies used by companies such as Facebook, Amazon, Google, Youtube, and the BBC.

We had good reasons to be optimistic. The GDPR receives a lot of attention. It employs harsh penalties, which can presumably serve as effective deterrence. Additionally, the cultural convention is that Europeans generally tend to be compliant and law abiding[18].

But we were disappointed. Instead of the recommended Flesch-Kincaid score of 8th grade for consumer-related materials[19], understanding the average policy in our sample requires almost 13 years of education. Almost all the privacy policies in our sample, about 97%, received a higher than recommended score.

Readability remains a challenge

The European legislature thought that using plain language in privacy agreements can be part of a better, holistic approach to users’ privacy. We believe this is an idea worth exploring.

While not a magic bullet, readability can prove to be important for users’ privacy. But despite the GDPR’s requirement, European citizens still encounter privacy policies that are largely unreadable.

Does the GDPR just bark, but not bite? While it is perhaps too early to say, we located 24 websites in our sample that included their privacy policies as drafted pre-GDPR. We then measured their readability. The results show that current privacy policies are only slightly more readable than the older ones.

This may offer some lessons. Most notably perhaps, good intentions and extensive legislation may not suffice. Merely having a general, vague law is not likely to yield the anticipated change.

References

  1. ^ digital capitalism (www.amazon.com)
  2. ^ exchange for their personal information (www.hbs.edu)
  3. ^ a vast amount of information on consumers (www.stuff.co.nz)
  4. ^ our research (papers.ssrn.com)
  5. ^ Why are Australians still using Facebook? (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal (www.bbc.com)
  7. ^ testified (www.washingtonpost.com)
  8. ^ Why you should talk to your children about Cambridge Analytica (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ GDPR (eugdpr.org)
  10. ^ citizens’ rights (www.eesc.europa.eu)
  11. ^ consumer protection (ec.europa.eu)
  12. ^ came into force (www.zdnet.com)
  13. ^ clear and plain language (www.cmswire.com)
  14. ^ our study (papers.ssrn.com)
  15. ^ Professor Uri Benoliel from Israel (clb.ac.il)
  16. ^ Flesch Reading Ease test (www.readabilityformulas.com)
  17. ^ Flesch-Kincaid test (en.wikipedia.org)
  18. ^ compliant and law abiding (www.npr.org)
  19. ^ 8th grade for consumer-related materials (contently.com)

Authors: Samuel Becher, Associate Professor of Business Law, Victoria University of Wellington

Read more http://theconversation.com/should-online-users-be-bound-by-their-privacy-agreements-112301

Business Reports

How to Deal With An HMRC Enquiry?

If you get that morning call or letter from the HMRC that they would like to investigate your tax position, you will most likely panic. You will not know what awaits you if this is your first time facing a tax investigation by H...

Why some are rich, others are poor – and what it means for future prosperity

What makes a nation wealthy?Getty ImagesWhy are some nations rich and others poor? Can the governments of poor nations do something to ensure that their nations become rich? These sorts of questions have long fascinated public off...

Creating my own space in the start-up tech industry

When I ventured out to launch a start-up targeting mums, I knew it wasn’t going to be easy. In a field that is heavily male-dominated, the gender funding gap is ever-present, with some suggesting the issue stems from bias that...

Australian CEO reaches record breaking donation goal

Leading Australian entrepreneur and philanthropist Chris Christofi has achieved his ambitious record-breaking goal to raise $250,000 for people experiencing homelessness, following the Vinnies CEO Sleepout which took place at th...

Biden says it will provide ‘a little bit of relief’ – but experts say even that may be a stretch

Gas prices are at record highs. AP Photo/Gene J. PuskarPresident Joe Biden called on Congress to suspend the federal gas tax to “bring families just a little bit of relief” as average gasoline prices exceed US$5 a gall...

Yes, fireworks prices are skyrocketing, but there should be plenty of bottle rockets and sparklers for you and your family this Fourth of July

Many cities, such as New York, returned to hosting big public displays in 2021 after skipping 2020 due to the pandemic. AP Photo/John MinchilloIf you’re looking forward to shooting off bottle rockets and Roman candles this F...



NewsServices.com

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion