Business Daily Media

Should online users be bound by their privacy agreements?

image

The political economy of digital capitalism[1] is largely premised on a new exchange: individuals enjoy cheap or free services and goods in exchange for their personal information[2].

Put simply, individuals often pay online, consciously or unintentionally, with their data and privacy. As a result, companies hold a vast amount of information on consumers[3], and consumers allegedly agree to that practice. But as our research[4] shows, online privacy agreements are largely incomprehensible.

Read more: Why are Australians still using Facebook?[5]

Regulating privacy

Privacy issues are becoming more and more salient, in part due to enormous privacy scandals. Perhaps most conspicuously, a massive public protest erupted in response to the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal[6]. In this case, the data of millions of people’s Facebook profiles was harvested. Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, testified[7] before two US senate committees about the company’s privacy practices.

Read more: Why you should talk to your children about Cambridge Analytica[8]

Privacy is now also at the forefront of policy making. The most systematic legislative attempt to make more order in the messy world of privacy is the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR[9]). It comes as no surprise that European legislature was breaking the ground in this realm. The EU is known to have a strong focus on citizens’ rights[10]. It is committed to data protection, and to consumer protection[11] more generally.

The GDPR came into force[12] in May 2018. Its primary objective is to level the playing field and give individuals more control over their personal data. The GDPR also aspires to force companies to be more transparent around data collection and more cautious about its usage.

Clear and plain language

Another interesting aspect of the GDPR is its requirement to clearly communicate privacy terms to end users. In this respect, the GDPR requires companies to use “clear and plain language[13]” in their privacy agreements.

Making privacy policies readable may bring about a few notable benefits. For starters, drafting readable policies better respects users’ autonomy. Beyond that, readability can contribute to better comprehension of legal texts. This, in turn, can make such texts more salient, leading companies to draft more balanced terms.

But does this indeed materialise? In our study[14] (with Professor Uri Benoliel from Israel[15]), we examined whether, half a year post-GDPR, companies present users with online privacy agreements that are readable. We applied two well-established linguistic tools: the Flesch Reading Ease test[16] and the Flesch-Kincaid test[17]. Both tests are based on the average sentence length and the average number of syllables per word.

We measured the readability of more than 200 privacy policies. We gathered these policies from the most popular English websites in the UK and Ireland. Our sample included policies used by companies such as Facebook, Amazon, Google, Youtube, and the BBC.

We had good reasons to be optimistic. The GDPR receives a lot of attention. It employs harsh penalties, which can presumably serve as effective deterrence. Additionally, the cultural convention is that Europeans generally tend to be compliant and law abiding[18].

But we were disappointed. Instead of the recommended Flesch-Kincaid score of 8th grade for consumer-related materials[19], understanding the average policy in our sample requires almost 13 years of education. Almost all the privacy policies in our sample, about 97%, received a higher than recommended score.

Readability remains a challenge

The European legislature thought that using plain language in privacy agreements can be part of a better, holistic approach to users’ privacy. We believe this is an idea worth exploring.

While not a magic bullet, readability can prove to be important for users’ privacy. But despite the GDPR’s requirement, European citizens still encounter privacy policies that are largely unreadable.

Does the GDPR just bark, but not bite? While it is perhaps too early to say, we located 24 websites in our sample that included their privacy policies as drafted pre-GDPR. We then measured their readability. The results show that current privacy policies are only slightly more readable than the older ones.

This may offer some lessons. Most notably perhaps, good intentions and extensive legislation may not suffice. Merely having a general, vague law is not likely to yield the anticipated change.

References

  1. ^ digital capitalism (www.amazon.com)
  2. ^ exchange for their personal information (www.hbs.edu)
  3. ^ a vast amount of information on consumers (www.stuff.co.nz)
  4. ^ our research (papers.ssrn.com)
  5. ^ Why are Australians still using Facebook? (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal (www.bbc.com)
  7. ^ testified (www.washingtonpost.com)
  8. ^ Why you should talk to your children about Cambridge Analytica (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ GDPR (eugdpr.org)
  10. ^ citizens’ rights (www.eesc.europa.eu)
  11. ^ consumer protection (ec.europa.eu)
  12. ^ came into force (www.zdnet.com)
  13. ^ clear and plain language (www.cmswire.com)
  14. ^ our study (papers.ssrn.com)
  15. ^ Professor Uri Benoliel from Israel (clb.ac.il)
  16. ^ Flesch Reading Ease test (www.readabilityformulas.com)
  17. ^ Flesch-Kincaid test (en.wikipedia.org)
  18. ^ compliant and law abiding (www.npr.org)
  19. ^ 8th grade for consumer-related materials (contently.com)

Authors: Samuel Becher, Associate Professor of Business Law, Victoria University of Wellington

Read more http://theconversation.com/should-online-users-be-bound-by-their-privacy-agreements-112301

Business Daily Media Business Development

How Microsoft's Activision Blizzard takeover will drive metaverse gaming into the mass market

Ready Player 1,000,000,0001?Sergey NivensMicrosoft was positioning itself as one of the pioneers of the metaverse even before its US$75 billion deal to buy online gaming giant Activision Bli...

Theo Tzanidis, Senior Lecturer in Digital Marketing, University of the West of Scotland - avatar Theo Tzanidis, Senior Lecturer in Digital Marketing, University of the West of Scotland

Some of the super-rich want to pay more tax – but society cannot afford to depend on them

Shutterstock/PilgujDemands for the super wealthy to pay more taxes are not new. But they don’t usually come from billionaires or millionaires.Yet on January 19 2022, around 100 of the ...

Peter Bloom, Professor of Management, University of Essex - avatar Peter Bloom, Professor of Management, University of Essex

A killer app for the metaverse? Fill it with AI avatars of ourselves – so we don't need to go there

Ready avatar one?Athitat ShinagowinBig numbers coming. Microsoft’s US$75 billion (£55 billion) acquisition of Activision Blizzard has landed – true to Call of Duty vernacul...

Alex Connock, Fellow at Said Business School, University of Oxford, University of Oxford - avatar Alex Connock, Fellow at Said Business School, University of Oxford, University of Oxford

Labelling Equipment; Prayers Have Been Heard and, Answered

If you are an instrumental part of a management team for a business that now requires labels for their products or goods, then traditionally you’d have had one of three choices, if the...

Business Daily Media - avatar Business Daily Media

Leading Australian Microsoft partner Satalyst acquired by Canon

Satalyst, one of the leading Microsoft cloud and security partners in Australia, has today announced that effective immediately it has been acquired by Canon Australia. Satalyst will joi...

Business Daily Media - avatar Business Daily Media

How Timeline Maker Helps Business Owners On Their Targets

With many businesses today, the challenge is to make the audience know what you are all about. You can never go wrong with a website or an online presence for it is one of the most effecti...

Business Daily Media - avatar Business Daily Media



NewsServices.com

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion