Business Daily Media

It's one thing to build war fighting capability, it's another to build industrial capability

  • Written by Graeme Dunk, PhD Candidate, Australian National University

Amid fanfare last week at the start of the new financial year the government promised to invest A$270 billion[1] over a decade to upgrade the defence force.

It said a side benefit[2] would be a stronger local defence industry and “more high-tech Australian jobs”.

The prime minister’s statement hastened to add[3] that it was already strong

Australia’s defence industry is growing with over 4,000 businesses employing approximately 30,000 staff. An additional 11,000 Australian companies directly benefit from Defence investment and, when further downstream suppliers are included, the benefits flow to approximately 70,000 workers.

But the Australian part of Australia’s defence industry is small and getting smaller.

My analysis of contracts listed on the government’s Austender[4] website shows that while the proportion of defence department contracts awarded to Australian operated firms is usually well above 60%, the proportion awarded to firms that are both Australian operated and owned is much lower, presently 11%.

It's one thing to build war fighting capability, it's another to build industrial capability Austender, authors calculations It means that while Australians are being employed on defence department projects, the use of Australian firms that develop and own intellectual property is at a near-record low. Other analysis of the same data shows that the value of the contracts awarded to Australian owned companies is increasingly lower than for foreign owned companies. This is backed up by the annual Australian Defence Magazine[5] survey of the top 40[6] defence contractors. Despite the fact that in the most recent survey two of the biggest contractors declined to take part – the French-owned Naval Group Australia[7], which has the contract for the Future Submarine program[8], and the US-owned Raytheon[9] – it has the advantage of including subcontracting relationships not shown in Austender. The survey finds that while the amount of work done by Australian-controlled companies has held up since 2015, it has been increasingly subcontracted to foreign-owned prime contractors. This subordinate role has important implications for the health of Australia’s industry and national resilience. For industry it means that Australia is denied the full economic benefits that would come from designing and running projects and owning the intellectual property. For national resilience it increases Australia’s exposure to events outside its control. Read more: Scott Morrison pivots Australian Defence Force to meet more threatening regional outlook[10] If foreign-controlled firms withdraw, withhold or otherwise redirect assistance (or if they are directed to do so by foreign governments) it is harder for Australia’s industry to pick up the slack. The supply chain interruptions caused by COVID-19 have highlighted these vulnerabilities. Brent Clark, the national chief executive of the Australian Industry and Defence Network says he was “shocked to learn how many of our supplies are sourced from overseas and how quickly those supplies became hard to access as soon as overseas countries required them for their own purposes”. He says the industry is not asking for a free ride, but it does want to be able to compete for contracts in a fair and equitable manner. Read more: Defence update: in an increasingly dangerous neighbourhood, Australia needs a stronger security system[11] This isn’t to suggest Australia needs to it do all. Complete self-sufficiency in defence is unrealistic. But it would deepen Australia’s war fighting capability if Australian firms had the ability to to supply and maintain much of the essential equipment we will need to use. And it would strengthen our ability to deal with other crises. COVID-19 has shown that industrial capability and resilience are intrinsically linked. The Government’s rhetoric and policies support home-grown growth. All that is needed now is commitment backed up by accountability. Louisa Minney, defence consultant, business analyst and company director, contributed to this article.


  1. ^ A$270 billion (
  2. ^ side benefit (
  3. ^ hastened to add (
  4. ^ Austender (
  5. ^ Australian Defence Magazine (
  6. ^ top 40 (
  7. ^ Naval Group Australia (
  8. ^ Future Submarine program (
  9. ^ Raytheon (
  10. ^ Scott Morrison pivots Australian Defence Force to meet more threatening regional outlook (
  11. ^ Defence update: in an increasingly dangerous neighbourhood, Australia needs a stronger security system (

Authors: Graeme Dunk, PhD Candidate, Australian National University

Read more

Business Reports

Six reasons why it pays to automate billing in your business

Harnessing the power of technology to improve the efficiency and accuracy of your billing process can supercharge productivity and profitability. Is your enterprise plagued by billing errors, or struggling to get invoices out...

How Sport4 is changing the way you watch sports

Forget about pay-per-view or checking the score at half time – Sport4 is changing the way Australians watch sports.  Fresh from their national debut at the Judo Australia National Championships, Sport4’s automated sports...

Advantages of Vacation Rental Management Software

The first vacation rental management software systems were launched in the early 1980s. At the time, they were majorly used by hotel owners to manage their properties online. The main functions included hotel reservations and ...

TIP Group grows; appoints new senior executives

Teaminvest Private Group Limited (ASX:TIP) has appointed two new senior executives to further accelerate the company’s growth. Timothy Wong has been appointed Head of TIP Equity (the company’s private equity division) and...

What to Look for in a Point of Sale System

When you're looking for a point of sale system for your business, there are a lot of things to consider. What type of business do you have? How many employees do you have? What features are important to you? In this blog post...

Why Roe v. Wade's demise – unlike gay rights or Ukraine – isn't getting corporate America to speak up

Many Americans reacted with outrage to the Supreme Court's decision to dismantle the constitutional right to abortion.AP Photo/Rick BowmerCorporate America – once known for carefully avoiding public stances on hot button iss...

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion