Trump’s opening tariff salvo will hurt US consumers − following through on Canada, Mexico threats will increase the price pain
- Written by Jason Reed, Associate Teaching Professor of Finance, University of Notre Dame
If U.S. voters reelected Donald Trump hoping for relief from higher prices[1], his recent threats to impose tariffs on America’s three largest trade partners might make them think again.
On Saturday, Feb. 1, Trump announced 25% tariffs[2] on Canada and Mexico and 10% tariffs on China, which he said would take effect on Tuesday, Feb. 4[3]. While markets braced for the news to some degree, they still saw a steep premarket sell-off[4] on Monday, Feb. 3, followed by morning volatility.
While Canada[5] and Mexico[6] negotiated monthlong reprieves on Monday, the new tariffs on China went into effect as expected Tuesday, Feb. 4. And while the ultimate shape of Trump’s tariff policy remains to be seen, the president warned that American consumers could feel “some pain[7]” as a result.
Given my training as an economist and finance professor[8], I think Trump could be right on that score. In fact, if the tariffs go into effect, they could spell disaster for the Federal Reserve’s inflation reduction efforts[9].
From grocery stores to homes
U.S. consumers might be surprised to find out that almost every economic sector could be affected by this opening salvo of tariffs, should they go ahead in March. Imports from Mexico and Canada reached close to US$1 trillion in 2024[10], almost double the amount the U.S. imports from China.
The U.S. is particularly reliant on Mexico for fresh fruits and vegetables[11], and on Canada for lumber[12]. So if the tariffs go into effect, Americans who have been waiting for home prices to ease[13] may have to continue waiting, as tariffs on lumber and other building materials could worsen the affordable-housing crunch[14]. And let’s not even talk about avocado prices[15].
Meanwhile, the 10% tariffs on Chinese goods will likely boost the price of electronics[16], and China has already imposed retaliatory measures[17]. Trump has also proposed 25% tariffs[18] on Taiwan and its semiconductor industry, in an attempt to push Taiwanese companies to invest more in U.S. manufacturing. If that tariff were to go into effect, prices for U.S. consumers would be even higher.
A tax by any other name …
Tariffs are an import tax[19]. They’re passed through the supply chain in the form of higher prices and are eventually paid by consumers[20]. Traditionally, governments have used tariffs as a fiscal tool to encourage businesses and consumers to move away from foreign-made products and support domestic businesses instead.
In theory, new tariffs could encourage foreign businesses to invest in the U.S. and make more stuff on American soil. Unfortunately, domestic manufacturing has seen a systemic decline[21] since the 1980s, resulting in lower prices for consumers but severely limiting U.S.-produced products. In the short term, at least, import taxes on Canadian, Mexican and Chinese products would ultimately be paid by U.S. consumers.
Although this round of tariff threats may seem arbitrary to some, the Trump administration says it considers tariffs deeply intertwined with national security concerns[22]. Stephen Miran, Trump’s pick to chair the president’s Council of Economic Advisers, has laid out a path for Trump’s tariff plan[23], which he says is aimed at putting American industry on fairer ground against the rest of the world.
In the long term, it’s unclear whether Trump’s threatened trade war will bring domestic manufacturing back to the U.S. and start a new industrial renaissance. In the meantime, American consumers will likely be stuck holding the bag.
References
- ^ hoping for relief from higher prices (www.newyorker.com)
- ^ announced 25% tariffs (www.cnn.com)
- ^ take effect on Tuesday, Feb. 4 (www.npr.org)
- ^ steep premarket sell-off (www.wsj.com)
- ^ Canada (www.cnbc.com)
- ^ and Mexico (apnews.com)
- ^ some pain (www.cnn.com)
- ^ economist and finance professor (mendoza.nd.edu)
- ^ inflation reduction efforts (www.clevelandfed.org)
- ^ close to US$1 trillion in 2024 (www.census.gov)
- ^ fresh fruits and vegetables (www.cnn.com)
- ^ for lumber (www.axios.com)
- ^ waiting for home prices to ease (apnews.com)
- ^ could worsen the affordable-housing crunch (www.nahb.org)
- ^ avocado prices (www.bloomberg.com)
- ^ price of electronics (www.marketwatch.com)
- ^ already imposed retaliatory measures (apnews.com)
- ^ 25% tariffs (www.newsweek.com)
- ^ an import tax (theconversation.com)
- ^ eventually paid by consumers (www.nytimes.com)
- ^ systemic decline (www.bls.gov)
- ^ deeply intertwined with national security concerns (www.hudsonbaycapital.com)
- ^ laid out a path for Trump’s tariff plan (www.wsj.com)
