Business Daily Media

Men's Weekly

.

Unequal? Our analysis suggests Australia is a more equal society than has been thought

  • Written by Roger Wilkins, Professorial Fellow and Deputy Director (Research), HILDA Survey, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne
Unequal? Our analysis suggests Australia is a more equal society than has been thought

It has long been known that incomes in Australia are more evenly distributed than in the United States.

But Australia has been thought to be a less equal society than many European ones, sitting somewhere in the middle between the United States and countries such as France.

We can measure income equality using the so-called Gini coefficient[1], which gives a score of 0 to a country in which incomes are completely evenly distributed and a score of 1 to a country in which one person has all the income.

The OECD gives the US a score of 0.375, Australia a score of 0.32[2] and France a score of 0.29.

But we’ve done work using a broader measure of income[3] that incorporates all taxes paid, all company profits and (importantly) in-kind benefits such as health and education. And we’ve found the positions of Australia and France are reversed.

The US has an even less equal distribution of incomes under this measure (0.49 compared to 0.375), France a somewhat less changed distribution (0.33 compared to 0.29), and Australia a more equal distribution (0.28 compared to 0.32), making Australia the most equal country of the three in terms of income broadly defined.

We can show this in another way, comparing the share of broadly defined national income going to the top 10% of income earners.

On this measure, the US is easily the least equal of the three, with high earners getting 39% of national income. In Australia and France they get about 25%.

The US is also the least equal of the three, with Australia and France almost tied, when comparing the share of broadly defined income going to the bottom 50%.

In Australia and France, the bottom 50% get the most, at around 29%. In the US, the least, at 19%

We used a method pioneered by researchers in the US and Europe[4] that combines household survey data, administrative tax data and national accounts data to create what are known as distributional national accounts[5].

Compared with previous measures of inequality, it fully accounts for the effects of Australia’s system of in-kind government provision of services such as health and education, all company profits (including those not paid out as dividends) and all taxes including income tax, company tax and the goods and services tax.

Although we find Australian incomes are much more evenly distributed than previously thought, they have gotten less equal in the past three decades.

Since 1991, the average incomes of Australia’s top 1% – and the top 0.1% in particular – have grown far faster than the average incomes of the bottom 90%.

Read more: Who gets what? Who pays for it? How incomes, taxes and benefits work out for Australians[6]

We also find a persistent gender gap in incomes, even when we account for income sharing in households, and for government spending on education, health, housing and social programs. Broadly measured, female economic wellbeing remains below that of males.

Our approach, described in full in our paper[7] and guided by previous studies for France[8] and the US, leaves room for refinement.

But it is enough to make clear that standard measures that leave out components of income and don’t account for taxes and benefits don’t tell the full story.

References

  1. ^ Gini coefficient (corporatefinanceinstitute.com)
  2. ^ 0.32 (data.oecd.org)
  3. ^ broader measure of income (docs.iza.org)
  4. ^ Europe (www.aeaweb.org)
  5. ^ distributional national accounts (wid.world)
  6. ^ Who gets what? Who pays for it? How incomes, taxes and benefits work out for Australians (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ paper (docs.iza.org)
  8. ^ France (doi.org)

Authors: Roger Wilkins, Professorial Fellow and Deputy Director (Research), HILDA Survey, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne

Read more https://theconversation.com/unequal-our-analysis-suggests-australia-is-a-more-equal-society-than-has-been-thought-202950

Beyond borders: Building a scalable strategy for international hiring

For many Australian businesses, growth increasingly depends on thinking beyond local borders.  As wage pressures rise, and specialised talent pool...

The Next Generation of Maritime Sustainable Solutions

As organizations globally seek innovative ways to improve sustainability and their impact on Earth, the American Waterways Operators (AWO), a lead...

Demand for Home Batteries surges as Federal Rebate Kicks In

A leading provider of energy solutions VoltX Energy has seen a 400% increase in demand for home batteries in the past three weeks as people put d...

Why Sport Remains the Safest Bet in an Uncertain World

When Rome was in crisis, its leaders did not retreat to the Senate. They went to the circus. To the chariot races. To the gladiators. Sport was no...

THE FINE LINE WITHIN HILARIOUS SIGNAGE DESIGN FAILS

It seems like design failures still occur in today’s modern branding era, despite rigorous rounds of approvals behind the scenes. One signage show...

Deputy Announces Exclusive Global Partnership with Predelo to Bring AI to Shift-Based Businesses

Deputy, the global people platform for shift-based businesses, has announced an exclusive partnership with Predelo, an AI Decision Agent-as-a-Serv...

Sell by LayBy