A fierce bidding war is under way for the rights to stream and broadcast cricket for the next five years. The price is expected to reach A$1 billion, almost double the previous deal. Media companies are facing stiff competition because increasing viewer numbers are luring social media websites and other platforms into the race to host this content.
The price for rights keeps going up even though the Nine Network is losing money on its cricket coverage and Seven’s CEO Tim Worner has stated recent price increases for sports rights “are not sustainable”.
The Big Bash League, which is also broadcast internationally, is a huge driver behind the new rights deal. The new players interested in the streaming rights include telecommunications companies like Optus and Telstra, social media platforms (Facebook and Twitter) and Cricket Australia itself, which has its own website and app. This is on top of the traditional broadcasters like Nine and Ten.
Sport is key for broadcasters as they can attract advertisers with the promise of viewers who are watching live. Social media platforms and other websites want to lure viewers onto their platforms to discuss the games. Streaming platforms and telcos are trying to appeal to customers with access to exclusive content.
Other sporting codes have recently been through this bidding process, and the deals they have struck hint at what is to come for Cricket Australia.
But the AFL deal also faced a backlash from fans after it restricted Telstra to streaming just a 7-inch video of live coverage – larger screens are filled with black space. This is true even for those who buy the A$89 subscription to the AFL Live app.
Fox Sports streams live full HD video as part of the deal.
One of the major drivers of the price of sports rights is the increase and uptake of streaming. Broadcasters want the rights to televise and stream the games, while tech companies, telcos and others are more interested in the streaming rights.
Last year’s women’s Big Bash League was streamed across cricket.com.au, Facebook and the Cricket Australia app, reaching 1.5 million people. This season, 47 of the matches were streamed on Mamamia, a lifestyle website aimed at women.AAP
Social media platforms want live sport to attract large crowds that will then use the platform to discuss the event. Twitter has a deal to stream Major League Baseball games (and formerly had one with the National Football League).
In addition to social platforms, Telstra and Optus have been competing with each other by offering exclusive content. Telstra holds AFL and NRL streaming rights, and also has a TV service, giving customers access to various content including sport.
Optus is an official partner of Cricket Australia, allowing its customers to stream cricket without incurring data charges. Optus also has exclusive broadcast rights to the 2018 FIFA World Cup.
We have seen Seven recently undertake a hybrid mode with its coverage of the Olympics and Australian Open tennis. The broadcaster offers a premium paid tier alongside its free streaming. This mode has created tension between free-to-air broadcasters and Foxtel, with requests for the government to remove the anti-siphoning rules that prevent pay TV bidding for particular sports.
Foxtel is currently not involved in broadcasting domestic cricket, but it is likely to be part of new negotiations. The government has awarded Fox Sports a A$30 million grant to support the coverage of women and niche sports. If nothing else, Fox Sports could seek to pick up the rights to women’s cricket, including the Big Bash League, which has had only a small percentage of games broadcast.AAP
Cricket Australia has previously noted that media rights make up as much as 80% of its income. Whatever deal is struck will have a huge impact not just for the professional players, but for the grassroots as well.
Cricket Australia will want to get the most for its rights, but needs to make sure not to impact grassroots participation and attendance. This was one of the side effects in the United Kingdom when pay TV providers secured exclusive rights to broadcast the cricket.
There is a huge opportunity here for Cricket Australia to advance the way in which the game is delivered to all screens. But, as we can see, the changing media landscape means it needs to balance the needs of many stakeholders.
- ^ A$1 billion (www.theaustralian.com.au)
- ^ previous deal (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ losing money (www.smh.com.au)
- ^ has stated (www.smh.com.au)
- ^ also broadcast internationally (www.channel5.com)
- ^ A$2.5 billion (www.afl.com.au)
- ^ starting this year (www.nrl.com)
- ^ backlash from fans (theconversation.com)
- ^ want (mumbrella.com.au)
- ^ according to one Cricket Australia executive (www.theaustralian.com.au)
- ^ streamed (www.cricket.com.au)
- ^ Mamamia (www.mamamia.com.au)
- ^ The future of sportscasting? Cricket Australia launches on Apple TV (theconversation.com)
- ^ deal (blog.twitter.com)
- ^ formerly (www.nfl.com)
- ^ streamed the Melbourne Cup (theconversation.com)
- ^ bid US$600 million (twitter.com)
- ^ has described sport (www.sporttechie.com)
- ^ holds (theconversation.com)
- ^ official partner (www.optus.com.au)
- ^ data charges (www.optus.com.au)
- ^ broadcast rights (yescrowd.optus.com.au)
- ^ YouTube could change the way we broadcast sport in Australia (theconversation.com)
- ^ now owned (theconversation.com)
- ^ stated (mumbrella.com.au)
- ^ premium paid tier (www.7tennis.com.au)
- ^ tension (theconversation.com)
- ^ anti-siphoning rules (www.communications.gov.au)
- ^ grant (www.grants.gov.au)
- ^ Chasing the audience: is it over and out for cricket on free to air TV? (theconversation.com)
- ^ previously noted (www.alrc.gov.au)
- ^ one of the side effects (theconversation.com)
Authors: Marc C-Scott, Lecturer in Screen Media, Victoria University