VotRite is committed to maintaining an environment free from bullying and harassment. Our workers are treated with dignity and we all hold ourselves to above higher than average standards for our performance.

The past year leading up to the November elections, VotRite and its leadership have experienced something so unfamiliar, it took them time to realize the intention: harassment.

Our executives at times play dual roles within the community. There is purpose for the accomplishment of VotRite that far exceeds the services we provide. Our service, tallying votes, may appear simple. The success of achieving within VotRite will stretch to provide for countless other endeavors, which are already planned and developed by VotRite's executives and its affiliations.

Our endeavors include supporting the well-being and fitness of any uniquely-abled person, supporting marginalized or displaced populations all over the world, planned humanitarian objectives, charity, and more.

The planning has been extensive, and it all relies on one condition- the success of VotRite. Which has been publicized for some time now, without receiving enough support.

So, what are we waiting for? That's the right question. The products are built with Americans in mind and are ready to go, but VotRite still lacks funding. A company committed to charitable endeavors and a primary focus on giving to the American community is lacking funding to proceed on-time, while the foreign vendors that compromised our elections for the past three cycles have just renewed their contracts to participate in this November's election.

Furthermore, our executives have been experiencing less-than- desirable interference with even established, community-based programs, which we created from scratch, tested, and found success with, until around a year and a half ago.

How, you ask?

To speak candidly, people that appear interested in these community programs, which include special needs services built by one of our executives, have joined proximal to where these programs and the executives work and take place. They have even used unfamiliar "friendships" to take contracts directly from the executive serving as the provider and then quit soon after, which inhibits support and grinds all progress to a halt for the client.

They create conflicts that did not exist, they attempt to influence the special needs population to shy away from the owner of the company providing for them for 5 years with incredible results promoting independence and fitness. They even have the audacity to offer people that do not have the ability to consent to intimacy advice on dating, and have creating new symptoms that have never existed for the clients that the VotRite executive had to return to assist to process, since they quit the job soon after and did not ensure a back up.

When that does not impact the executive enough, they make direct contact with the executive and produce threats, citing that they are affiliated with military defense, mafias, or severely mentally ill and therefore unaccountable for the hardships they have caused the special needs clients and the executive in charge of them. What do any of these backgrounds have to do with special needs and providing a remedy for them, professionally? Politics and governments on the other hand... But the executive is still not affiliated and doesn't understand why.

They appear to be trying to use social influence as a way to dismiss the executive's competence, through a vulnerability that does not appear to directly influence VotRite , but it certainly does. The people VotRite will employ and support long-term.

These uniquely-abled adults are primarily now training to work with our team at VotRite. They were trained without this objective and have requested it directly since they understood the executive was due to transition full-time for the upcoming elections.

This is well-known, and only after these new "workers" show to the field, do we see a clear change in commitment from the uniquely-abled.

The strategy on more than one occasion is as follows: they were influenced primarily by these individuals threatening the executive, whom simultaneously took the exact job that executive had previously, influenced that person with disabilities to no longer use the fitness services the executive provided for them nearly 6-8 hours a week for years, citing symptoms of disabilities that have been worked through for years without re-appearing and were still not evident, and then these "workers" quit soon after without replacing themselves. Since they threatened the executive, the executive no longer provides services to that individual consistently and the individual has regressed in progress. Something far beyond unacceptable from the executive's standpoint.

As a professional that deals with the human mind, this is profoundly intentional and threatening. They blatantly disregarded five years of effort, injuring the capabilities of people that have worked so hard, just to attempt to degrade the value of the executive at VotRite publicly, while also decreasing their manpower, which VotRite has always relied on and prioritized, should these people choose to participate. They have recently shown interest, but now our team lacks more funding to make their dreams a reality. For what?

By mocking the provider and executive’s competence through misinformation, they have attempted to sabotage the bridge that was built to encourage inclusion of the total population and intentionally limited funding at the most important time. We later find out through their confident displays that they also feel connected to foreign sources and had old connections with one another that we were informed of after it was too late. Too weird, if you ask us. If we are still the strongest form of support through this crisis, going back to correct it without funding, who do we ask for help?

By delaying this process, since the human mind requires a lot of time and effort to train and re-train, pulling the executive back to ensure no fallout from the new trauma these clients have experienced by feeling less active or burdened by these "workers" opinions of the executive, the focus has been pulled from VotRite at a very critical time.

Where are the investors?

Why are many families, even those with venture capitalist parents, now choosing to tolerate these "workers" from irrelevant backgrounds without the skills, and only recently, over the VotRite executive that provided such freedom for the families and success for the child, from years before? It did not occur before these threats and attempts. It only began to occur when the election cycle started being discussed.

Beats me.

Angelica Kapsis is the President and Co-Founder of VotRite, a Florida company dedicated to re-shaping how elections are conducted in the United States.